<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons 6S Loves the New Adwords Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.6smarketing.com/best-new-adwords-interface-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.6smarketing.com/best-new-adwords-interface-features/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Seddon</title>
		<link>http://www.6smarketing.com/best-new-adwords-interface-features/comment-page-1/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Seddon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.6smarketing.com/?p=1797#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>Nice article Quentin. You&#039;ve certainly brought out the top 5 features about the new interface.

I will probably still drag the Search Query Report off to Excel though as I like to run sorts within sorts to help identify the keywords to address.

I&#039;m also pretty well settled with the offline editor so a lot of the issues with the old interface didn&#039;t really bother me that much as I could work fairly fast offline.

However I can see why Google has made most of the changes it has.

A few extra &quot;real features&quot; would have been nice. For example showing us what search queries we got impressions for but no clicks. What a boost to negative keywords that would be!

Cheers
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Quentin. You&#8217;ve certainly brought out the top 5 features about the new interface.</p>
<p>I will probably still drag the Search Query Report off to Excel though as I like to run sorts within sorts to help identify the keywords to address.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also pretty well settled with the offline editor so a lot of the issues with the old interface didn&#8217;t really bother me that much as I could work fairly fast offline.</p>
<p>However I can see why Google has made most of the changes it has.</p>
<p>A few extra &#8220;real features&#8221; would have been nice. For example showing us what search queries we got impressions for but no clicks. What a boost to negative keywords that would be!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
